Yes. All images submitted for sale on Maia Pix go through a structured review process before being published.

The process includes:
– An initial automated check to verify compliance with content guidelines;
– A second manual review focused on image quality and suitability for sale.

Only images that pass both stages are published on Maia Pix.

Images that violate Maia Pix guidelines or contain references to prohibited content cannot be sold.

In particular, the following are not allowed:
– sexual or explicit content, including pornography, explicit nudity, fetishes, or sexual references;
– violent content, including blood, torture, abuse, suicide, or violence against people or animals;
– discriminatory or offensive content, such as insults, hate speech, or derogatory language;
– political, religious, or sensitive public-figure references, including political leaders, religious symbols, or ideologies;
– copyright violations or improper use of protected subjects;
– explicit or non-compliant text present in the image or in the prompt.

Images falling into these categories may be rejected or permanently banned, with no possibility of resubmission.

No. Only images created with Maia AI—generated through Maia App or Maia Pix—can be listed for sale on Maia Pix. This ensures traceability, consistency, and compliance with the platform’s content guidelines.

Once a Creator submits an image for sale, it enters the review process and one of three outcomes may occur:
– Approved → the image is published and made available for sale.
– Down (needs revision) → the image has quality or formal issues that can be corrected and may be edited and resubmitted.
– Banned → the image violates the platform’s content guidelines (for example, due to blacklisted terms) and cannot be resubmitted.

In all cases, the Creator receives an email notification with the review outcome and, when applicable, guidance on how to improve the image.

Yes. Any user can report images they consider inappropriate or potentially non-compliant using the dedicated reporting feature available on the platform. Reports are reviewed by the Maia Pix team in accordance with the applicable guidelines and policies.

The aesthetic quality of images is evaluated during the manual review based on standardized criteria, including:

– clarity and recognizability of the main subject;
– correct proportions and scale of elements;
– completeness and coherence of the background;
– overall technical quality of the image;
– consistency between the image, any text present, and the visual context.

These criteria help maintain a consistent quality standard across Maia Pix.

An image can be marked as “Down” even if it does not violate the blacklist when it does not meet the quality standards required for sale on Maia Pix. In these cases, the image does not contain prohibited content but can be improved from an aesthetic, technical, or compositional standpoint before being published.

Yes. If an image is marked as “Down,” it can be edited and resubmitted for a new review. The email notification you receive will outline the issues identified, helping you improve the image before submitting it again.

There is no predefined maximum number of resubmissions. However, each new submission is reviewed individually and must demonstrate improvement compared to previous versions.

The quality assessment is based on standardized criteria designed to reduce subjectivity and ensure a consistent standard across the marketplace. Human review is used to verify that the image is suitable for sale and for the overall user experience on Maia Pix.

Yes, in certain cases. An image that has already been approved may be removed if:

– it receives substantiated reports from users;
– violations of the guidelines that were not initially detected come to light.

In such cases, the situation is reviewed by the Maia Pix team.

Yes. Image quality is one of the factors considered in the classification system that determines the price tier assigned by the platform. The price is not set by the Creator but is automatically defined to ensure consistency and transparency.

Yes. Marketplace performance (such as user interest and sales) can contribute to the overall evaluation of images over time. This helps highlight Creators who produce compliant content that is appreciated by users.